Denali Night Fever and the Future of DAC
Music. Dancing. Free food and drink. Did I mention drink? All in a room full of engineers…? As it turns out, Denali Night Fever provided an excellent opportunity for a veritable who’s who of EDA luminaries and the rest of us just along for the ride to relax after a couple of long days at the DAC. The event was held at the On Broadway Event Center just a few blocks away from the
The party itself was a blast, but the more interesting question is whether the same held true for DAC this year. According to Richard Goering, there were 5,135 registered attendees, 3,796 exhibitor attendees, and 400 “other” attendees, for a total of 9,331 people. These numbers are down significantly from last year’s DAC in
Richard’s take was that there wasn’t much exciting going on this year at DAC, but I would tend to disagree. All four of us from Verilab who attended the conference were able to attend interesting product demos and sessions, and met up with people we otherwise would have had to travel far and wide to see. It also gave us a chance to catch up ourselves, as there were Verilab attendees from the
Some of the info at the conference could have been gleaned from attendance at DVCon or DATE. The technical sessions at DVCon were consistently the most relevant to my role as a verification consultant. Its smaller size (710 attendees) made it a good “starter conference” to help kick off the season. DATE was good because it gave me the opportunity to catch up with current/former clients and colleagues of mine in Europe, and to get a better understanding of what the design and verification community in
Is DAC still relevant? For me, the answer is yes. Your mileage may vary. If you’ve never been to any of the major conferences (a situation I found myself in before this year), you’re missing out. My horizons have broadened significantly over the last few months. I’ve got a much better appreciation for the state of the industry, what tools and methodologies are available, and who to call if I need a helping hand than I did back at the beginning of February.


June 15th, 2007 at 10:00 am
This report might be a perfect description of what is wrong/right with EDA now. EDA is almost wholly focused on the issue of verification now, not the process of design. And it’s become much more of a service industry thatn a product industry. Going forward, DAC should focus on what the industry does best. ESL belongs in accelerated computing and embedded systems conferences, DFM belongs at Semicon, and DVCon and DAC should merge. The industry has trifurcated.
June 17th, 2007 at 1:46 pm
Interesting though. I personally found it nice to be able to visit with companies with products outside my area of expertise. As an example - I went to a Magma demo for Talus. Sadly - I was the only one there and couldn’t ask any intelligent questions of the presenters. But had there been others present I would have been able to learn from the insights of engineers in a field I would otherwise have very little reason to communicate with.
June 19th, 2007 at 12:55 pm
[...] coarse DAC is not DAC without the Denali party. JL Gray was kind enough to blog about the party and provide a little more insight into the future of DAC as well as post some [...]